Social networks and social networking


Article Type: Guest editorial From: The Learning Organization, Volume 16, Issue 6

Why a special issue on “Social networks and social networking”? Well, because in my opinion it is well overdue since we have been in the “network age” for a very long time – let’s face it, no matter how structured and controlled the organization, behind the formal hierarchy, networks of people in, across, and up and down the org-chart really govern pretty much everything that goes on – but, more particularly, because over the last few years there has been a revolution in network-related capability. At one level this is evident in our enhanced ability to analyze and optimize social and technology networks for purpose, and at another level the ability of individuals to be unhesitatingly and ceaselessly connected via technology.

This revolution clearly impacts many aspects of organizational design. More subtly perhaps, it also heightens the criticality of socio-tech concerns. For example it raises questions related to an organization’s workforce; currently many Gen X managers feel only marginally comfortable with a PC and the web, whereas the Millennium Generation of professionals embrace technologies like twitter and del.icio.us quite naturally, and are already exploring Web 2.0. Is it Luddite to ask “What does this portend for appropriate leadership capability? Will the infrequency of face-to-face contact give rise to trust issues? Will the rush to exchange online discussion-bytes and texting reduce attention spans, real dialogue, and learning? What about confidentiality and security?” And so on and on!

A number of journals do address various facets of social networks and/or social networking, but many are too theoretical for the average manager or practitioner. TLO, with its mandate to emphasize the practical implementation of concepts important to organizations, has dipped a toe in this water before (The Learning Organization, 2005) but not with such a precise focus. I am hopeful that TLO will in future sponsor at least one special issue per year devoted to social networks and social networking, and to their practical impact on organizations. In this regard, I hope that you the reader will find the current SI to be a good start.

Gareth Morgan in Images of Organization (Morgan, 1986, pp. 130-1) recounts a story attributed to Hampden-Turner about Picasso who was painting the portrait of a man’s wife. The man decided to visit Picasso with an eye to the progress that had been made. When they stood in front of the unfinished picture, Picasso asked the man “What do you think?” The man tried to be polite and said “Well, it isn’t how she really looks”. So Picasso asked “What does your wife really look like?” The man produced a photo of his wife and handed it to Picasso. Picasso gazed at the photo for a minute or so and then said “Mmm … small, isn’t she?!” In the spirit of Picasso, I have attempted to provide in this SI a number of viewpoints on the differing “realities” of social networks and networking. I hope that you the reader will agree that the six excellent papers included here illuminate many important facets of this topic; in this same vein, the goal of future related SIs will be that a reader should not say of this topic “Mmm … small, isn’t it?!”

Patti Anklam sets the scene through her exploration of “Net work”, starting in 1999 with the application of social network analysis and visualization methods from the social sciences to understand how organizations really work. She traces development of applications during the dot com boom before providing a perspective on emergent web technologies of a social interactive nature. Patti’s paper provides a valuable guide to making sense of the plethora of social tools, social networking sites, and web applications.

Verna Allee provides an overview of value network analysis (VNA) together with examples and insights from its practical application. VNA overcomes the “split” in business management where human interactions and relationships reside in one world of models and practices and business processes and transactions reside in another. Verna’s paper expands the application of social or organizational network analysis by pointing to a next generation of analysis and analytics that can support organizational effectiveness.

Stephan Henneberg, Juani Swart, Peter Naudé, Zhizhong Jiang and Stefanos Mouzas elucidate the role of social networks in mobilizing how individuals both impact and are impacted on by their colleagues. They compare the human resource management (HRM) academic community to two other comparable communities and show the application of SNA to identify how groups interact over time, and how a large network can be systematically analysed to reveal its underlying structure and properties.

Janel Smith’s paper is intended to stimulate interest and investigation regarding solidarity networks which are much less studied than social networks. She explores in depth the theoretical foundations of solidarity networks and also their utility as an enabling force for social organizations to influence change. Janel proposes a theoretical framework for solidarity networks, and highlights elements of it that are applicable to such important private-sector business issues as sustainability, corporate responsibility, and innovation.

Hsi Chang Li, Sam Mirmirani and Joseph Ilacqua focus on Confucius Institutes in assessing the applicability of theories of leadership and knowledge sharing to multinational organizations and worldwide networks. Their findings suggest that distributed leadership is a suitable management style for coping with global cultural and socio-political issues, and that when paired with a knowledge sharing network the combination is suitable for complex decision making globally in both learning institutions and business organizations.

Klara Palmberg, in pursuing the development of knowledge, metaphors and language for management of new forms of organizing, explores the concept of complex adaptive systems (CAS) from the perspective of managing organizations. To this end Klara presents a “CAS – system management” model for managing organizations and illustrates its application via a case study of management principles in an organization with unconventional ways of management.

As always the comments of you, the reader, are much appreciated.

Peter A.C. Smith
Guest Editor

References

(The) Learning Organization (2005), “Knowledge sharing”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 12 No. 6, special issue (Guest Editor: Peter A.C. Smith)

Morgan, G. (1986), Images of Organization, Sage Publications, London

size=1 width="100%" noshade color="#aca899" align=center>