Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, June 2005
Knowledge Management At Bharti Tele-Ventures – A Case Study
Arun Hariharan, Bharti Cellular Ltd.

ABSTRACT:

Bharti Tele-Ventures Ltd. is India’s first and largest telecommunications company in the private sector. Bharti is a fully integrated telecommunications company providing mobile, fixed line, long distance and enterprise services. It is the leader in the GSM mobile market in India. Knowledge Management (KM) is one of Bharti’s key strategic initiatives. This case study covers what KM means for Bharti, why it embarked on a formal KM program, key enablers to KM,  business results and critical success factors.


What Knowledge Management (KM) Means For Bharti

 

At Bharti, Knowledge Management (KM) is what KM does … for business results and for creating an organizational culture of uninhibited sharing & replication of knowledge.

KM for Bharti is a tool to achieve business objectives faster & better - through an integrated set of initiatives, systems and behavioral interventions - to promote smooth flow & sharing of knowledge relevant to the business and to eliminate re-invention.

Why Bharti Embarked On A Formal KM Program

KM is not an end in itself. We at Bharti believe KM effectively deployed can be a powerful enabler of:

Ø      Consistent customer experience by reducing variation in performance across business units or across time

Ø      Speed in business results by eliminating reinvention

Ø      Converting individual knowledge into re-usable organizational knowledge – to the extent possible

Ø      Empowering each individual employee to leverage the collective knowledge of the entire organization in serving customers

Key Enablers Of KM At Bharti:

Bharti has seven categories of enablers for KM - strategic focus, alignment with business, KM organization, KM processes, culture, content-quality and technology. Our initiatives under each of these categories are described below:

1. Strategic Focus

The biggest enabler is the focus and seriousness of top management and high expectations from KM. KM ranks number five out of the company’s top ten strategies identified to achieve the company’s business objectives over the next three to five year time horizon. KM and its results form part of monthly business reviews, and of all important management communications. Performance appraisals at all levels include KM-specific measures. The company has institutionalized President’s and CEO’s Awards for KM.

2. Alignment with business objectives

According to Mr. Badri Agarwal, President, Bharti Infotel, “KM for us is not fashion, but a serious tool to achieve our business objectives with maximum speed and zero re-invention”. KM and its results form a permanent agenda item on the President’s business reviews with CEOs of each business unit and CEOs’ reviews within their units. Mr. Manoj Kohli, President, Bharti Cellular, identified three strategic business imperatives – Customer Delight, Revenue Enhancement and Productivity / Value Maximization. A set of top priority business measures has been defined. It was ensured that each top priority measure maps with at least one of the President’s three strategic imperatives – otherwise, it wouldn’t be on the top priority list. All KM initiatives including knowledge repositories, sharing, replication and communities of experts, are structured around each of these top priority business measures. Our knowledge-map is based on our business process map, and critical measures under each process – which helps us ensure that all KM initiatives are structured and focused around critical business processes. The results of KM are measured in terms of impact on these top priority business measures. Our KM initiative is very clearly focused on (even skewed toward) knowledge replication with quantified and demonstrated results on critical business measures.

3. KM Organization and Roles

Bharti has dedicated KM coordinators centrally and at each business unit. These people act as catalysts in the KM process. They are change agents who bring in and spread the culture of knowledge sharing across the organization. They influence other employees and facilitate the process of sharing and replicating knowledge and measuring the results. We also have communities of experts led by knowledge champions. These are functional experts in each of our critical business processes. They collaborate and promote knowledge sharing, replication and performance improvement in their own area of specialization, with necessary support and facilitation from the KM coordinators.

4. Standard KM Processes

We have defined and are institutionalizing standardized, close-looped processes for knowledge-sharing, replication and measurement of results. Knowledge-sharing and replication that could help improve performance on critical business measures will no longer be a matter of chance or choice, but a mandatory activity like any other business process. Our business leaders are extremely supportive of institutionalizing these KM processes. In fact the demand for such processes came from some of our business leaders.

5. Culture and People Engagement

For creating an organization-wide culture of knowledge-sharing and replication, and to institutionalize KM, it is critical for all employees to engage in KM activities, and not just a fraction of our employee base. To help us keep track of this, we are putting in place a measurement of “employee engagement in KM”. Each month, the percentage of employees in every business unit and in every critical business process who have been part of at least one knowledge submission to the company knowledge base, or a knowledge replication initiative or a knowledge sharing session, will be measured and reported. This will be included in regular business reviews. Our target is to have 40% employee engagement in all directly customer-impacting processes within a year and 80% within two years. We also use employee communications, posters, weekly “did you know…?” emails and other media to create curiosity, excitement and awareness about KM among all employees.

We have a knowledge-dollar (K$) scheme under which employees earn points or K$s every time they share new knowledge in the company knowledge base or every time they replicate or apply knowledge shared by others. This and similar reward and recognition schemes have been institutionalized at the level of individual employees, functional heads and business units. The objective of these schemes is to create interest, excitement and motivation among people, and ensure that early adaptors get high visibility so that they serve as role models for others. We have a KM orientation-training module to which existing and new employees are exposed.

All employees are encouraged and given rights to submit content to company knowledge repositories. Initially, we were deliberately not over-stringent about quality of content submitted, and would publish most submitted content. It is important to encourage employees to make more submissions and create a culture of free knowledge sharing in the organization. We believe the initial phase of culture-building, and of encouraging free knowledge flow, has largely been achieved in the company. This phase lasted about eighteen months. The “quality screws” are now being gradually tightened – as described in the next point.

6. Quality of Content in Knowledge Repositories

Quality of content is ensured in two steps. First, all content submitted is scanned by a member of the KM team to ensure relevance to the business, quality of documentation and adherence to standard KM formats. The content then goes to the knowledge champion and community of experts who “own” the concerned knowledge repository. They finally review and approve content for publishing, or edit or reject it if required. Having standard documentation formats for knowledge sharing, replication and knowledge-sharing sessions helps us maintain quality and objectivity of content. These standards are also part of the KM orientation training, which a majority of our employees have gone through.

7. Technology Enablement

For us, KM is not about technology or IT. However, we have deployed technology as a powerful enabler for KM. Our Knowledge Portal Gyan Bharti on the corporate Intranet is a common virtual platform for all employees to share knowledge and replication. It contains repositories of re-usable organizational knowledge structured around critical business processes. It helps us to knit experts in each of these processes into communities, and facilitates collaboration among members of these communities. The KM portal has automated workflows for knowledge submission, approval and publishing. It also automatically allots K$ to employees, and lets them check their K$ balance and transactions.

Measuring The Impact Or Results Of KM

As emphasized earlier, for Bharti, KM is what it does for business results. We measure the results of KM in terms of its impact on critical business measures. The impact of each knowledge replication on a business measure is captured and documented. We have a simple standard format for documenting replications. The format includes the quantified impact of the replication on a business measure. During the last year, over 1,500 knowledge submissions by employees were published on the KM portal. Each one of these was from an internal or external source, and screened for relevance to at least one critical business process before publishing. During the same period, over 450 of these submissions were applied or replicated by at least one other business unit within the group – which means a replication rate of 30%.

Here are two examples of sample business results:

Ø      One replication enabled a business unit to reduce customer complaints related to bills not being received by customers (a critical business measure) from 4.2 complaints for every 100 customers each month to 0.74. This was done by taking best practices from a knowledge submission from another unit published through KM and replicating these

Ø      Another replication enabled a business unit to reduce its technical faults (another critical business measure) from over 20 faults for every 100 customers each month to under 4 faults within a two month period.

Almost every one of the 450 replications completed so far has a similar story to tell about direct quantified improvement in a critical business measure.

Critical Factors Responsible For Institutionalization Of KM At Bharti

While many enablers have been discussed above, the biggest factors responsible for results, institutionalization to date, and future sustenance are:

Ø      High expectations and seriousness of top management. The alignment of performance appraisal systems at all levels to include KM-specific measures and including KM performance as a regular agenda item on business reviews reflect this seriousness. At Bharti, KM is not a fad, but is a serious tool for business excellence.

Ø      Constant focus on hard business results, without losing sight of the culture angle.

Ø      Standardized close-looped processes for knowledge sharing, replication and measurement of results.


About The Author

Arun Hariharan is a Knowledge Management, Quality and Performance Management practitioner. He is Senior Vice President – Knowledge Management at Bharti Cellular Ltd. (www.bharti.com). He can be contacted at arun_hariharan@rediffmail.com.